TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. Leslie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Texas has clarified that enforcing “reasonable non- compete agreements is within the public interest.”
• holding that the “use of an employer's confidential information and the possible loss of customers is sufficient to establish irreparable harm.”
• holding that the “possible loss customers is sufficient to establish irreparable harm.”
• entering a limited injunction that was not overbroad despite an overbroad geographic restriction in the relevant agreement itself
• reforming agreement at temporary injunction stage and noting that (1) under section 15.51, “[t]he court need not wait for the parties to request [reformation],” and (2
• stating, at the temporary injunction phase, that “the Court will . . . reform the contract as necessary based on the current evidence, noting that any reformation or permanent injunction to be entered may differ from this temporary reformation . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).