Skip to main content

Mathewson v. State

Citations

  • 431 P.3d 1121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the State offered sufficient evidence to show requisite fraudulent intent
  • “‘The plain, ordinary, and usual meaning of words used in a statute controls in the absence of clear statutory provisions to the contrary.’” (quoting Adekale v. State, 2015 WY 30, ¶ 12, 344 P.3d 761, 765 (Wyo. 2015))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boomgaarden, Burke, Davis, Fox, Kautz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.