Mathes v. Sher Express, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that MAI 19.01 is not limited to negligence cases
• noting that a single verdict form used to submit multiple theories of liability “would also have the potentially salutary purpose of avoiding a retrial in the event that some error or insufficiency of evidence was found in only one of the verdict directing theories”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).