Utah Supreme Court· 11/15/1982
Mason v. State
Citations
- 656 P.2d 465
- 1982 Utah LEXIS 1119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that abutting property owner's right to preserve status quo entitles owner to easement over abandoned public road only where and to extent necessary for ingress and egress to and from property
- concluding that abutting property owner's right to preserve status quo entitles owner to easement over abandoned public road only where and to extent necessary for ingress and egress to and from property
- concluding that abutting property owner’s right to preserve status quo entitles owner to easement over abandoned public road only where and to extent necessary for ingress and egress to and from property
- noting that abutting property owner cannot recover damages for deprivation of access to public road “so long as there is some alternative means of access to his property that is ‘adequate and reasonable’
- \[An abutting landowner has a private easement of ingress and egress to existing public highways.\
- upon abandonment one-half of highway belongs to grantee or then present owner and not to original dedicator
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oaks, Hall, Durham, Stewart, Howe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gillmor v. WrightUtah Supreme Court· 1993-03-22· cited 54×
- LeSatz v. DeshotelsColorado Court of Appeals· 1988-02-11· cited 21×
- Law v. Monongahela Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-12-12· cited 17×
- Culbertson v. Board of County CommissionersUtah Supreme Court· 2001-12-18· cited 5×
- Culbertson v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SALT LAKE COUNTYUtah Supreme Court· 2001-12-18· cited 4×
- Brooks v. BonnetNevada Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 1×
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Walker Development PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2014-02-06· cited 1×
- Ty Farming Company, Inc. v. George Belew and The County of Dyer, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-11-08
- Lauren Shearer v. Ronald Raymond & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2021-01-13
- Bellevue Properties, Inc. v. 13 Green Street Properties, LLC & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2021-10-08
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-12-21· cited 192×
- Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court· 1832-03-12· cited 147×
- Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court· 1896-04-13· cited 48×
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-06-11· cited 43×
- Sowadzki v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court· 1909-06-11· cited 32×
- Blackham v. SnelgroveUtah Supreme Court· 1955-02-28· cited 23×
- Rexroat v. ThorellIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-21· cited 23×
- Brown v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court· 1909-02-02· cited 23×
- Pinellas County v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-12-05· cited 18×
- White v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court· 1952-01-04· cited 16×
- Jacobson v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1968-07-18· cited 15×
- Utah Road Commission v. HansenUtah Supreme Court· 1963-07-12· cited 14×
- Schettler v. LynchUtah Supreme Court· 1901-03-25· cited 14×
- Christensen v. Lelis Automatic Transmission Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1970-04-03· cited 13×
- Thurman v. ByramUtah Supreme Court· 1981-02-10· cited 12×
- Hague v. Juab County Mill & Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1910-02-11· cited 11×
- Wynia v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court· 1979-09-05· cited 10×
- Burrows v. GuestUtah Supreme Court· 1886-06-15· cited 10×
- Bailey Service & Supply Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1975-03-25· cited 9×
- Sevener v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1972-12-18· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.