Skip to main content
· 12/5/1975

Pinellas County v. Austin

Citations

  • 323 So. 2d 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing recovery where plaintiffs had to traverse a less convenient route and their municipal services were disrupted
  • although vacation of street did not totally destroy access since small wooden bridge remained, access sufficiently impaired to permit award of damages; fact that other means of access exist may reduce the amount of recovery
  • title to vacated street reverted to adjacent property owners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.