· 12/5/1975
Pinellas County v. Austin
Citations
- 323 So. 2d 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing recovery where plaintiffs had to traverse a less convenient route and their municipal services were disrupted
- although vacation of street did not totally destroy access since small wooden bridge remained, access sufficiently impaired to permit award of damages; fact that other means of access exist may reduce the amount of recovery
- title to vacated street reverted to adjacent property owners
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grimes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.