LeSatz v. Deshotels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no great necessity for the sought easement because the plaintiff, among other things, could 8 create access to his property by building a bridge
• while absolute or strict necessity is not required to create an easement for access, such an easement by implication is not to be sanctioned if available alternatives offering reasonable means of ingress exist
• articulating rule set forth in Rexroat, 433 N.E.2d at 238
• assessing great necessity at time of suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).