Skip to main content
· 2/20/2013

Mary Burton v. Teleflex Inc

Citations

  • 707 F.3d 417
  • 2013 WL 616973
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3538
  • 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,770
  • 117 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a reasonable showing of pretext combined with a prima facie case may be enough to survive summary judgment
  • stating that a party may supplement the record on appeal in only “exceptional circumstances”
  • outlining the requirements for a plaintiff to establish a prima facie case of sex and age discrimination
  • treating plaintiff’s PHRA claims as identical to her ADEA and Title VII claims
  • treating plaintiff's PHRA claims as identical to her ADEA and Title VII claims
  • treating plaintiff's PHRA claims as identical to her ADEA and Title VII claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ambro, Greenaway, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.