Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “cannot justifiably rely on mere speculation that these adverse actors learned of her complaints from other employees”
• holding that protected activity for purposes of a prima facie case of retaliation includes informal protests of discriminatory employment practices
• holding that protected activity includes an employee’s filing of formal charges of discrimination against an employer
• holding that retaliation claims under the ADEA and Title VII are subjected to identical analysis
• recognizing that a complaint about a manager, without relating the complaint to discrimination based on a protected category, is not covered by Title VII’s opposition clause
• holding that the plaintiff could not establish a causal connection between her protected activities and the adverse action because the decision makers “lacked knowledge of her protected conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).