Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 879 S.W.2d 54
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 72
  • 1993 WL 664215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a charging instrument that tracks the language of the statute defining the offense will generally be sufficient to charge an offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Clinton, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.