Ex Parte Lemke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that court would address merits of subsequent habeas application when applicant showed that present claim could not have been presented in his initial writ application because the factual basis for it was \unavailable\
• ruling that prejudice prong of Strickland was satisfied by evidence that defendant would have accepted the plea bargain offer had it been communicated by counsel
• ruling that prejudice prong of Strickland was satisfied by evidence that defendant would have accepted the plea bargain had the offer been communicated by counsel
• ruling that prejudice prong of Strickland was satisfied by evidence that defendant would have accepted the plea bargain had the offer been communicated by counsel
• ruling that prejudice prong of Strickland was satisfied by evidence that defendant would have accepted the plea bargain offer had it been communicated by counsel
• finding prejudice where counsel failed to convey two plea offers to the defendant, and defendant stated he would have accepted either offer if they had been communicated to him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).