Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 3/27/2007

Martinez v. Carr

Citations

  • 479 F.3d 1292
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7074
  • 2007 WL 901922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he mere issuance of a citation requiring presence at future legal proceedings does not qualify as a constitutional ‘seizure.’”
  • a choice between arrest or signing a citation containing a promise to appear later for trial under penalty of arrest is not a seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Ebel, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.