Tenth Circuit· 3/27/2007
Martinez v. Carr
Citations
- 479 F.3d 1292
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7074
- 2007 WL 901922
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he mere issuance of a citation requiring presence at future legal proceedings does not qualify as a constitutional ‘seizure.’”
- a choice between arrest or signing a citation containing a promise to appear later for trial under penalty of arrest is not a seizure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Ebel, Gorsuch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burg v. GosselinSecond Circuit· 2010-01-07· cited 193×
- Royce McLin v. Jason ArdFifth Circuit· 2017-08-08· cited 152×
- Fisher v. City of Las CrucesTenth Circuit· 2009-10-19· cited 131×
- Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2016-03-08· cited 84×
- Rojas v. AndersonTenth Circuit· 2013-07-09· cited 54×
- Deutsch v. JordanTenth Circuit· 2010-08-24· cited 41×
- J.H. Ex Rel. J.P. v. Bernalillo CountyTenth Circuit· 2015-11-27· cited 38×
- Gaston v. PloegerTenth Circuit· 2007-04-12· cited 18×
- Peak Alarm Co., Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 2010-04-16· cited 15×
- United States v. Lewis Powell, IISixth Circuit· 2015-08-19· cited 11×
- Strepka v. SailorsD. Colorado· 2007-07-02· cited 10×
- Grider v. City of AuburnM.D. Alabama· 2009-06-18· cited 10×
- Stewart v. City of Prairie VillageD. Kansas· 2012-10-17· cited 7×
- Singleton v. CannizzaroE.D. Louisiana· 2019-02-28· cited 5×
- Beers v. BallardTenth Circuit· 2007-10-01· cited 5×
- United States v. John LeyThird Circuit· 2017-11-22· cited 4×
- Caldwell v. JonesN.D. Indiana· 2007-09-19· cited 1×
- Murphy v. SpringN.D. Oklahoma· 2014-11-04· cited 1×
- Arnold v. CurtisTenth Circuit· 2007-08-01· cited 1×
- Smith v. McCordTenth Circuit· 2013-02-15
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 1,388×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 973×
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 800×
- Medina v. City & County DenverTenth Circuit· 1992-03-31· cited 481×
- Murphy v. LynnSecond Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 412×
- Castellano v. FragozoFifth Circuit· 2003-12-05· cited 341×
- Andrew M. Rohman v. New York City Transit Authority (Nycta), Carmen J. BiancoSecond Circuit· 2000-05-26· cited 321×
- Gallo v. City of PhiladelphiaThird Circuit· 1998-12-07· cited 312×
- DiBella v. Borough of BeachwoodThird Circuit· 2005-05-12· cited 166×
- Evans v. BallFifth Circuit· 1999-03-12· cited 137×
- Karam v. City of BurbankNinth Circuit· 2003-12-08· cited 137×
- Albright v. RodriguezTenth Circuit· 1995-04-07· cited 113×
- Gross v. PirtleTenth Circuit· 2001-04-09· cited 107×
- Britton v. MaloneyFirst Circuit· 1999-11-08· cited 104×
- Jones v. HuntTenth Circuit· 2005-06-14· cited 95×
- In Re Special Grand Jury 89-2Tenth Circuit· 2006-06-15· cited 63×
- Depiero v. City Of MacedoniaSixth Circuit· 1999-06-23· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.