Rojas v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, although the plaintiff “might well have been able to satisfy us that Defendants’ actions violated his clearly established rights,” the plaintiff “through his counsel, [has simply] failed to carry the burden assigned to him by law”
• finding that, although the plaintiff “might well have been able to satisfy us that Defendants’ actions violated his clearly established rights,” the plaintiff “through his counsel, [has simply] failed to carry the burden assigned to him by law.”
• finding that, although the plaintiff “might well have been able to satisfy us that Defendants’ actions violated his clearly established rights,” the plaintiff “through his counsel, [has simply] failed to carry the burden assigned to him by law.”
• finding that, although the plaintiff “might well have been able to satisfy us that Defendants’ actions violated his clearly established rights,” the plaintiff “through his counsel, [has simply] failed to carry the burden assigned to him by law.”
• finding that, although the plaintiff “might well have been able to satisfy us that Defendants’ actions violated his clearly established rights,” the plaintiff “through his counsel, [has simply] failed to carry the burden assigned to him by law.”
• finding that, although the plaintiff “might well have been able to satisfy us that Defendants’ actions violated his clearly established rights,” the plaintiff “through his counsel, [has simply] failed to carry the burden assigned to him by law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).