D. Puerto Rico· 2/18/1976
Martinez Rodriguez v. Jimenez
Citations
- 409 F. Supp. 582
- 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing a pretrial detainees’ access to counsel claim observing: “Assistance of counsel requires opportunity for consultation in conditions which will preserve the attorney-client privilege”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Leo F. Feeley, IV v. George Sampson, Etc.First Circuit· 1978-01-18· cited 91×
- Palmigiano v. GarrahyD. Rhode Island· 1977-08-10· cited 90×
- United States Ex Rel. Wolfish v. LeviS.D. New York· 1977-09-26· cited 78×
- Owens-El v. RobinsonW.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-01-04· cited 61×
- Santiago v. City of PhiladelphiaE.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-11-24· cited 55×
- Dawson v. KendrickS.D. West Virginia· 1981-08-10· cited 51×
- Chapman v. RhodesS.D. Ohio· 1977-06-29· cited 50×
- Feliciano v. BarceloD. Puerto Rico· 1979-04-25· cited 44×
- Billy Hite, and Bobby Sessions, Thomas E. Jones v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner, J. L. Harvey, Warden of Kirkland Correctional InstitutionFourth Circuit· 1977-10-25· cited 41×
- John Doe v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1983-01-28· cited 31×
- United States v. BynumFifth Circuit· 1978-01-26· cited 29×
- Roberto Martinez Rodriguez v. Irving JimenezFirst Circuit· 1977-03-23· cited 27×
- Moore v. JaningD. Nebraska· 1976-12-29· cited 23×
- Rutherford v. PitchessC.D. California· 1978-07-25· cited 22×
- Albert Blake v. Frank A. HallFirst Circuit· 1981-12-18· cited 19×
- Doe v. LallyD. Maryland· 1979-03-05· cited 15×
- Nadeau v. HelgemoeD. New Hampshire· 1976-12-06· cited 15×
- Hackl v. DaleWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-12-15· cited 12×
- Duckett v. WardS.D. New York· 1978-09-19· cited 12×
- Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez ColonD. Puerto Rico· 1988-07-28· cited 11×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 2,512×
- Jackson v. BishopEighth Circuit· 1968-12-09· cited 392×
- Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. John Collier, Superintendent, Mississippi State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1974-09-20· cited 349×
- Nathaniel Williams v. Leon J. Vincent, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1974-12-30· cited 228×
- Gene Woodhous v. Commonwealth of VirginiaFourth Circuit· 1973-07-27· cited 170×
- Rhem v. MalcolmS.D. New York· 1974-01-07· cited 126×
- Rhem v. MalcolmSecond Circuit· 1974-11-08· cited 117×
- Finney v. Arkansas Board of CorrectionEighth Circuit· 1974-10-10· cited 115×
- Louis Martinez v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden, Attica Prison, Dr. Williams, Dr. Stamburg, and Nurse Hoffman, Attica PrisonSecond Circuit· 1970-10-08· cited 114×
- Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. EisenstadtD. Massachusetts· 1973-07-06· cited 104×
- Hamilton v. LoveE.D. Arkansas· 1971-06-02· cited 100×
- Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. Thomas S. Eisenstadt, Etc., Frank A. HallFirst Circuit· 1974-04-08· cited 99×
- Nicholas A. Palmigiano v. Joseph BaxterFirst Circuit· 1973-11-16· cited 84×
- Nolan v. ScafatiFirst Circuit· 1970-08-14· cited 71×
- Jere Bishop v. Kent R. Stoneman, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of Vermont, and Julius v. Moeykens, Warden, Vermont State PrisonSecond Circuit· 1974-12-04· cited 55×
- Joseph T. Rozecki, Jr. v. Charles W. Gaughan, SuperintendentFirst Circuit· 1972-04-26· cited 47×
- Inmates of Milwaukee County Jail v. PetersenE.D. Wisconsin· 1973-01-17· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.