Skip to main content
· 5/30/1966

Jackson v. Bishop

Citations

  • 240 Ark. 1011
  • 403 S.W.2d 94
  • 1966 Ark. LEXIS 1443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]ue to the inconsistencies in the testimony of the witnesses at the new trial hearing, [appellant] has not shown that but for his counsel’s deficiencies, the outcome of his trial would have been different.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.