Skip to main content
· 6/7/1963

Martinco v. Hastings

Citations

  • 265 Minn. 490
  • 122 N.W.2d 631
  • 1963 Minn. LEXIS 691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a change in the statutes must come from the legislature
  • stating that a change in a statute must come from the legislature
  • “[W]hen a statute speaks with clarity in limiting its application to specifically enumerated subjects, its application shall not be extended to other subjects by process of construction.”
  • statutes dealing with rights and duties of emergency vehicle operators must be' construed together
  • “[C]ourts cannot supply that which the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks.”
  • specific exemptions cannot be extended by statutory construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.