Skip to main content
· 7/31/2007

In Re the Welfare of S.J.T.

Citations

  • 736 N.W.2d 341
  • 2007 Minn. App. LEXIS 109
  • 2007 WL 2178059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring juvenile appellant to show that district court’s error prejudiced its certification decision
  • “A district court has considerable latitude in deciding whether to certify, and this court will not upset its decision unless its findings are clearly erroneous so as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” (quotations omitted)
  • “A district court has considerable latitude in deciding whether to certify, and this court will not upset its decision unless its findings are clearly erroneous so as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted)
  • “A district court has considerable latitude in deciding whether to certify, and this court will not upset its decision unless its findings are clearly erroneous so as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worke, Kalitowski, Minge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.