Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court erred “[b]y failing to apply the mandatory ‘safe-harbor’ provision”
• “While the district court has the authority to assess sanctions . . . that authority is circumscribed by the 21-day safe-harbor provisions of the statute and the rule.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).