Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/18/1904

Rogers v. Alabama

Citations

  • 192 U.S. 226
  • 24 S. Ct. 257
  • 48 L. Ed. 417
  • 1904 U.S. LEXIS 1006

Syllabus

<p>A motion to quash an indictment for murder was made on the ground that all colored men' had been excluded from the grand jury solely because of their race and color, and because of a certain provision of the state constitution alleged to deny them the franchise in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. These provisions were set out. The motion, about two octavo pages in length, was stricken from the files by the state court on the ground of prolixity, members of the grand jury not having to have the qualifications of electors.</p> <p>Held, on error, that the reference of the motion to the constitutional require- . ments concerning electors as one of the motives -for the exclusion of the blacks did not warrant' such action as would prevent the court from passing on constitutional rights which it was the object of the motion to assert, and'that the exclusion of blacks from the grand jury as alleged was contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it inadequate to strike two-page motion to quash indictment as “prolix”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rogers v. Alabama

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.