Martin v. STERICYCLE, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in context of claim alleging retaliation on the basis of employer’s denial of vacation time, that the plaintiff “cannot now claim that the defendants acted improperly by failing to grant a privilege that was never sought”
• denying as futile request for continuance under predecessor to Rule 56(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).