Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/23/1998

Martin v. Scott

Citations

  • 156 F.3d 578
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23552
  • 1998 WL 650992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff's equal protection claim was frivolous where prisoners were not similarly situated
  • finding that allegations that a prisoner “became ill after being fed Vita-Pro—a soy-based meat substitute—simply do not rise to the level of cruel and unusual punishment”
  • “The plain language of [28 U.S.C. § 1915A] indicates that it applies to any suit by a prisoner against certain government officials or entities regardless of whether that prisoner is or is not proceeding IFP.”
  • affirming dismissal of section 1983 suit complaining of administrative segregation
  • reviewing dismissal as frivolous under § 1915A
  • labeling such a claim \frivolous\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Barksdale, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Martin v. Scott

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.