Curley v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where “amendment would be futile,” the court may dismiss a claim with prejudice
• holding that where “amendment would be futile,” the court may dismiss a claim with prejudice
• noting that litigants have post-judgment procedural safeguards to avoid erroneous sua sponte dismissals of complaints under § 1915
• noting that litigants have post-judgment procedural safeguards to avoid erroneous sua sponte dismissals of complaints under § 1915
• explaining that district courts should allow plaintiff to amend complaint when doing so would yield meritorious claim
• noting that “the standard for dismissal for failure to state a claim is essentially the same under” § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and Rule 12(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).