Washington Supreme Court· 12/31/2014
Martin v. Dematic
Citations
- 182 Wash. 2d 281
- 340 P.3d 834
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in which the trial court heard a summary judgment motion from the party that the plaintiff sought to add as a defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 866×
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 400×
- South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-02· cited 107×
- North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 75×
- Tellinghuisen v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 32×
- Segaline v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-19· cited 27×
- Stansfield v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2002-04-04· cited 25×
- Unruh v. CacchiottiWashington Supreme Court· 2011-07-21· cited 19×
- Perrin v. StenslandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-10-25· cited 11×
- Martin v. DematicCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-14· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.