Tellinghuisen v. King County Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citingS. Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass’n, 101 Wn.2d at 77 (inexcusable neglect where plaintiff could have discovered the identities of the additional parties from public records)
• \[T]he plaintiff's failure to timely name the correct party cannot have been `due to inexcusable neglect.'\
• neighbors failed to name property owners as defendEints in appeal of rezone decision
• “[T]he plaintiff’s failure to timely name the correct party cannot have been ‘due to inexcusable neglect.’ ” (quoting N. St. Ass’n v. City of Olympia, 96 Wn.2d 359, 368, 635 P.2d 721 (1981))
• no excuse where omitted parties' identity was matter of public record
• no excuse where omitted parties’ identity was matter of public record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).