Perrin v. Stensland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Failing to name [parties] when their identities are known or easily ascertainable is likely to be a strategic choice rather than a mistake.”
• CR 15(c) “is not limited to cases where a plaintiff files an amended complaint seeking to bring in a new defendant, but this is the typical circumstance that creates controversy”; Washington courts, like federal courts, “apply CR 15(c
• “inexcusable neglect has become firmly embedded in Washington case law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).