Skip to main content

Martin v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 409 S.W.3d 340
  • 2013 WL 5406640
  • 2013 Ky. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that manifest injustice occurs when a “defect in the proceeding [exists that is] shocking or jurisprudentially intolerable[]”
  • holding “[A]ssignments of error in ‘the giving or the failure to give’ an instruction are subject to RCr 9.54(2)'s bar on appellate review[.]”
  • applying palpable error review to jury instructions where the jury instruction was not correctly given
  • “RCr 9.54(2) bars palpable error review for unpreserved claims that the trial court erred in the giving or the failure to give a specific instruction.”
  • “RCr 9.54(2) bars palpable error review for unpreserved claims that the trial court erred in the giving or failure to give a specific instruction[]”
  • “Under RCr 10.26, an unpreserved error may generally be noticed on appeal if the error is ‘palpable’ and if it ‘affects the substantial rights of a party.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.