Skip to main content
· 5/15/2007

Martha Hillier v. Social Security Administration

Citations

  • 486 F.3d 359
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11334
  • 2007 WL 1412404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expert’s opinion that a claimant who was limited to following “simple, concrete instructions” could work as a cashier was not inconsistent with the DOT’s description of cashier as requiring level three reasoning
  • expert’s opinion that a claimant who was limited to following “simple, concrete instructions” could work as a cashier was not inconsistent with the DOT’s description of cashier as requiring level three reasoning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Beam, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.