· 5/15/2007
Martha Hillier v. Social Security Administration
Citations
- 486 F.3d 359
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11334
- 2007 WL 1412404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expert’s opinion that a claimant who was limited to following “simple, concrete instructions” could work as a cashier was not inconsistent with the DOT’s description of cashier as requiring level three reasoning
- expert’s opinion that a claimant who was limited to following “simple, concrete instructions” could work as a cashier was not inconsistent with the DOT’s description of cashier as requiring level three reasoning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Beam, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.