Evelyn Clay v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is the ALJ’s role to resolve conflicts in experts’ opinions,” including “conflicts . . . internal to one expert’s opinion”
• noting that “it is the ALJ’s role to resolve conflicts in experts’ opinions,” including “conflicts … internal to one expert’s opinion”
• noting that “it is the ALJ’s role to resolve conflicts in experts’ opinions,” including “conflicts . . . internal to one expert’s opinion”
• noting that “it is the ALJ's role to resolve conflicts in experts’ opinions,” including “conflicts ... internal to one expert's opinion”
• noting that the ALJ did not err in omitting additional restrictions not supported by evidence
• noting the vocational expert’s testimony that a claimant limited to understanding, remembering, and following simple, concrete instructions was “arguably inconsistent with the [DOT’s] definition of the job of cashier”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).