Marshall v. Switzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “These two cases illustrate the fact that the Rehabilitation Act established a right to the provision of individualized services.”
• “Actions involving claims for prospective declaratory or injunctive relief are permissible provided the official against whom the action is brought has a direct connection to, or responsibility for, the alleged illegal action.”
• “Actions involving claims for prospective declaratory or injunctive relief are permissible provided the official against whom the action is brought has a direct connection to, or responsibility for, the alleged illegal action.”
• “Actions involving claims for prospective declaratory or injunctive relief are permissible provided the official against whom the action is brought has a direct connection to, or responsibility for, the alleged illegal action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kuck v. Danaher
  D. Connecticut· 2011-09-29· cited 62×
• Mercer v. Dora B. Schriro, Comm'r of the Dep't of Emergency Servs. & Pub. Prot., the Conn. State Police Union, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2018-08-28· cited 33×
• Davidson v. Scully
  S.D. New York· 2001-05-18· cited 18×
• Adler v. Pataki
  N.D. New York· 2002-05-10· cited 5×
• Peddle v. Sawyer
  D. Connecticut· 1999-07-22· cited 4×

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Harlow v. Fitzgerald
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
• Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
• Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
• Anderson v. Creighton
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
• Malley v. Briggs
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
• Edelman v. Jordan
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
• City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
• Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,717×
• Brandon v. Holt
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 1,538×
• John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, III
  Second Circuit· 1987-11-25· cited 734×
• James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional Facility
  Second Circuit· 1986-01-15· cited 571×
• Michael Fonte and Gilda Fonte v. The Board of Managers of Continental Towers Condominium
  Second Circuit· 1988-05-25· cited 254×
• Jermosen v. Smith
  Second Circuit· 1991-10-01· cited 166×
• Kevin Richardson v. Donald Selsky, Clement Capuano, William Fenton, Bernard Lonczak
  Second Circuit· 1993-09-22· cited 157×
• Horace Luckey, III v. Joe Frank Harris, Governor
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-11-23· cited 137×
• Patricia Finnegan v. Richard Fountain
  Second Circuit· 1990-10-01· cited 126×
• Project Release v. Prevost
  First Circuit· 1983-10-24· cited 121×
• McKINNON v. PATTERSON
  Second Circuit· 1978-02-21· cited 107×
• Carey v. Klutznick
  Second Circuit· 1980-12-15· cited 95×