Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/4/2013
Marshall v. State
Citations
- 213 Md. App. 532
- 74 A.3d 831
- 2013 Md. App. LEXIS 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “a grant of a new trial effectively wipes out the prior proceedings” (citation modified)
- concluding that the grant of a new trial “effectively wipe[d] out the prior proceedings” and required the defendant to allege at his second trial that the Maryland gang statute was unconstitutional even though he had raised that same issue prior to his first trial
- concluding that the grant of a new trial “effectively wipe[d] out the prior proceedings” and required the defendant to allege at his second trial that the Maryland gang statute was unconstitutional even though he had raised that same issue prior to his first trial
- concluding that the grant of a new trial “effectively wipe[d] out the prior proceedings” and required the defendant to allege at his second trial that the Maryland gang statute was unconstitutional even though he had raised that same issue prior to his first trial
- concluding that the grant of a new trial “effectively wipe[d] out the prior proceedings” and required the defendant to allege at his second trial that the Maryland gang statute was unconstitutional even though he had raised that same issue prior to his first trial
- defendant’s omnibus motion pursuant to Rule 4-252 “failed to comply with the requirements of Md. Rule 4-252(e)” in asserting a challenge to constitutionality of gang participation charge on retrial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sibug v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-25· cited 7×
- Sibug v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-02· cited 3×
- Baires v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-01-28· cited 3×
- Zadeh v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-29
- Bivens v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-07-11
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-07· cited 137×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-10-01· cited 114×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-24· cited 100×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-01· cited 82×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-10· cited 82×
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
- Denicolis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-10· cited 67×
- Finke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-08· cited 55×
- Streater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-17· cited 53×
- People v. ShannonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1979-01-16· cited 49×
- Wilder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-25· cited 40×
- Hurst v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-07-31· cited 39×
- Cottman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-12-08· cited 38×
- Decker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-13· cited 27×
- Sessoms v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-01-11· cited 25×
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-29· cited 25×
- Simms v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 12×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-08· cited 11×
- Burris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-28· cited 5×
- Mines v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.