Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 5/2/2014

Marshall v. State

Citations

182 So. 3d 573
2014 WL 1744103
2014 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that claims that a prosecutor made an improper argument or engaged in misconduct are nonjurisdictional claims that are subject to the grounds of preclusion set out in Rule 32.2
holding that claims that a prosecutor made an improper argument or engaged in misconduct are nonjurisdictional claims that are subject to the grounds of preclusion set out in Rule 32.2
\ ' \ 'A lawyer can almost always do something more in every case. But the Constitution requires a good deal less than maximum performance.' \ ' \
\ ' \ 'A lawyer can almost always do something more in every case. But the Constitution requires a good deal less than maximum performance.' \ ' \ (citations omitted)
matter inquired about occurred 35 years before the defendant's trial
matter inquired about occurred 35 years before the defendant's trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bürke, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Windom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

164 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.