Third Circuit· 6/7/2016
Mark Wallach v. Eaton Corp
Citations
- 837 F.3d 356
- 95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1725
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16796
- 2016 WL 4791849
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning, in the context of assignment of antitrust claims, that federal common law, not individual state laws, should govern, and adopting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 332 as the governing federal common law
- “[W]e hold that an assignment of a federal antitrust claim need not be supported by bargained-for consideration in order to confer direct purchaser standing on an indirect purchaser; such assignment need only be express, and that requirement was met here.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chagares, Krause, Scirica
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Third Circuit· 2017-08-15· cited 260×
- Joan Kedra v. Richard SchroeterThird Circuit· 2017-11-28· cited 217×
- Liana Revock v. Cowpet Bay West Condominium AsThird Circuit· 2017-03-31· cited 131×
- E.O.H.C. v. Secretary United States DepartThird Circuit· 2020-02-13· cited 81×
- Covertech Fabricating, Inc. v. TVM Building Products, Inc.Third Circuit· 2017-04-18· cited 42×
- Marion Diagnostic Ctr., LLC v. Mckesson Corp. (In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-06-26· cited 11×
- Bahaa Aly v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals InterThird Circuit· 2021-06-16· cited 9×
- In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-11-22· cited 9×
- In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-08-23· cited 7×
- Walgreen Co v. Johnson & JohnsonThird Circuit· 2020-02-21· cited 2×
- Walgreen Co. v. Johnson & JohnsonE.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-03-25· cited 1×
- Courtemanche v. NobleFirst Circuit· 2026-05-28
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 2,704×
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court· 1979-04-02· cited 1,102×
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-04-25· cited 898×
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 882×
- In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John aThird Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 850×
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncThird Circuit· 2004-05-24· cited 653×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 652×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Third Circuit· 2010-04-16· cited 416×
- Hartig Drug Co Inc v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co LtdThird Circuit· 2016-09-07· cited 343×
- ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationThird Circuit· 2012-09-28· cited 267×
- Miles v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Second Circuit· 2006-12-05· cited 260×
- White-Squire v. United States Postal ServiceThird Circuit· 2010-01-27· cited 215×
- Mountain Top Condominium Association v. Dave Stabbert Master Builder, Inc.Third Circuit· 1995-12-18· cited 172×
- Harris v. PernsleyThird Circuit· 1987-05-15· cited 171×
- Duraco Products, Inc. v. Joy Plastic Enterprises, Ltd., D/B/A Backyard Products Travis Products, IncThird Circuit· 1994-12-16· cited 163×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.