· 12/23/1992
Mark Brittingham v. United States
Citations
- 982 F.2d 378
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 17217
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10240
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33349
- 1992 WL 379372
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the warden of a California state prison was the proper respondent to federal habeas petition
- stating proper respondent in 8 federal habeas petition is petitioner's immediate custodian
- stating proper respondent in federal habeas petition is petitioner’s 27 immediate custodian
- stating proper respondent in federal habeas petition is petitioner’s immediate custodian
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, O'Scannlain, Per Curiam, Rymer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.