Margetson v. United Van Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The award of either multiple or punitive damages is inconsistent with the legislative intent of the Carmack Amendment, which allows recovery of only actual damages; the imposition of treble or punitive damages would impermissibly frustrate legislative intent.”
• state statutory consumer protection claims preempted by Carmack Amendment
• “The Carmack Amendment is to be broadly construed[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).