Pnh Corporation v. Hullquist Corporation, Garvey Transport, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where a defendant acted as a warehouseman rather than as a carrier, the Carmack Amendment was not applicable
• “In subsection (b), the burden of proof to establish exactly where the loss occurred lies with the carrier found liable under subsection (a).”
• \Subsection (b) ... allows the initial carrier found strictly liable under subsection (a) to be indemnified by the carrier `over whose line or route the loss or injury occurred. . . .'\
• “Subsection (b) ... allows the initial carrier found strictly liable under subsection (a) to be indemnified by the carrier ‘over whose line or route the loss or injury occurred .... ’ ”
• vacating District Court’s sua sponte dismissal of crossclaim for indemnification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).