Skip to main content
· 12/30/1987

Intech, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.

Citations

  • 836 F.2d 672
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16920
  • 1987 WL 26463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that what constitutes delivery is governed by the bill of lading or contract and the intent of the parties
  • explaining that the Carmack Amendment applied when machinery was shipped under a bill of lading but never delivered because a dispute arose over which party was responsible for unloading the shipment
  • finding that the “the intention of the parties defines” the meaning of delivery
  • “[t]he Carmack Amendment provides the exclusive remedy,” for “ ‘an action for damages against the delivering carrier’”
  • the terms of the delivery are defined by the bill of lading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Torruella, Noonan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.