Ninth Circuit· 2/3/2004
Marcus C. Sanders v. A.A. Lamarque, Warden
Citations
- 357 F.3d 943
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541
- 2004 WL 193857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a juror was not dishonest in fail- ing to disclose that twenty-five years previously she had lived in an area with gang activity
- habeas relief affirmed on same theory where state trial court had dismissed the only juror who was holding out in favor of acquittal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Thomas, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fields v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2007-09-10· cited 149×
- Hooks v. WorkmanTenth Circuit· 2010-05-25· cited 114×
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-10· cited 86×
- Byrd v. LewisNinth Circuit· 2009-05-15· cited 57×
- State v. DepazWashington Supreme Court· 2009-04-02· cited 52×
- State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-08-18· cited 31×
- Fields v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2005-12-07· cited 29×
- State Of Washington, Resp-cross App v. John Alan Whitaker, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-11-05· cited 17×
- State v. BerniardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-24· cited 13×
- Williams v. JohnsonNinth Circuit· 2016-05-27· cited 11×
- Byrd v. LewisNinth Circuit· 2007-12-11· cited 9×
- United States v. Duane EhmerNinth Circuit· 2023-12-07· cited 9×
- United States v. Volodymyr KvashukNinth Circuit· 2022-03-28· cited 6×
- United States v. Michael Joseph MurphyNinth Circuit· 2007-04-18· cited 5×
- Wilson v. California State Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-12-16· cited 2×
- State Of Washington, V Clabon Terrel BerniardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-24
- United States v. MurphyNinth Circuit· 2007-04-17
- Byrd v. LewisNinth Circuit· 2007-12-10
- Williams v. CavazosNinth Circuit· 2016-05-27
- Williams v. CavazosNinth Circuit· 2016-10-21
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 4,077×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 2,323×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,407×
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 1,080×
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 808×
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 490×
- Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob BorgNinth Circuit· 1990-01-19· cited 325×
- Gary Benn v. John Lambert, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryNinth Circuit· 2002-02-26· cited 243×
- John J. Zichko v. State of Idaho Larry Wright, Warden Alan LanceNinth Circuit· 2001-06-05· cited 167×
- United States v. Warren Brown, A/K/A Prince AsielD.C. Circuit· 1987-07-07· cited 160×
- United States v. Julio GonzalezNinth Circuit· 2000-06-15· cited 156×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. John Fife Symington, Iii, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1999-06-22· cited 146×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1995-12-01· cited 145×
- United States v. ThomasSecond Circuit· 1997-05-20· cited 123×
- United States v. A. Lanoy Alston, D.M.D., P.C. Ronald D. Walker Desert Valley Dental, Ltd. Richard B. Meyer Aaron L. (\Lanoy\) AlstonNinth Circuit· 1992-09-11· cited 92×
- United States v. Michael A. AjiboyeNinth Circuit· 1992-04-14· cited 82×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.