Skip to main content
· 5/12/2006

Mantiply v. Mantiply

Citations

  • 951 So. 2d 638
  • 2006 WL 1304936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “no contract, whether express or implied-in-fact, is formed without an offer, an acceptance, consideration, and mutual assent to terms essential to the contract.”
  • “In order for a plaintiff to prevail on a claim of unjust enrichment, the plaintiff must show that the defendant holds money which, in equity and good conscience, belongs to the plaintiff or holds money which was improperly paid to defendant because of mistake or fraud.”
  • differentiating between contracts implied in fact and law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bolin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.