Byrd v. Lámar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is a \settled rule that this Court does not address issues raised for the first time in a reply brief\
• holding that acts of promissory fraud — which require proof that the defendants intended not to perform promised acts — were not protected by state-agent immunity
• noting the \settled rule that this Court does not address issues raised for the first time in a reply brief\
• noting the \settled rule that this Court does not address issues raised for the first time in a reply brief\
• \Circumstantial evidence is appropriate proof of a present intent not to perform in a promissory-fraud case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).