Skip to main content

Mann v. Mann

Citations

  • 476 N.W.2d 439
  • 190 Mich. App. 526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court cannot “do by a postjudgment interim order temporarily changing custody that which it cannot do by a final order changing custody”
  • holding that a trial court cannot “do by a postjudgment interim order temporarily changing custody that which it cannot do by a final order changing custody”
  • “The trial court also committed clear legal error in delegating to the Friend of the Court the child support determination.’’
  • “Our conclusion that the trial court committed clear -3- IV. LEGAL CUSTODY “[T]he Child Custody Act draws a distinction between physical custody and legal custody . . . .” Merecki v Merecki, 336 Mich App 639, 647; 971 NW2d 659 (2021
  • “Our conclusion that the trial court committed clear legal error [in erroneously changing custody in an ex parte temporary order] does not, however, compel us to reverse the court’s final order changing custody, because a hearing de novo was eventually held.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Holbrook, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.