Mariya Barretta v. Maksim Zhitkov

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “defense counsel will often have the best-informed view of the defendant’s ability to participate in his defense”
• holding that California could establish a presumption of competence and place the burden of proof on a defendant seeking to prove incompetence
• holding that California could establish a presumption of competence and place the burden of proof on a defendant seeking to prove incompetence
• holding that the Mathews test “does not provide the appropriate framework for assessing the validity of state procedural rules which ... are part of the criminal process”
• holding that due process guarantee is not violated by placing burden on defendant to prove incompetency to stand trial
• holding that due process -8- No. 24-4019, United States v. Mincy in the criminal context covers only those processes rooted in history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).