Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the doctrine only applies in the limited cases of trespass, nuisance, and civil rights violations
• explaining that in the context of the appeal at hand, the “plaintiffs have waived the issue by giving it such cursory treatment”
• recognizing application of the doctrine only in connection with actions in trespass, nuisance, and civil rights
• recognizing application of the doctrine only in connection with actions in trespass, nuisance, and civil rights
• stating that a party may not take a position in the trial court and later seek redress on appeal that is based on a position contrary to that earlier position
• summarizing the Michigan Supreme Court’s use of the continuing wrong doctrine as limited to actions in trespass, nuisance, and civil rights violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).