Seventh Circuit· 12/7/2009
Mann v. Calumet City
Citations
- 588 F.3d 949
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26602
- 2009 WL 4546352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[n]o court thinks . . . that [the Fourteenth Amendment] means the state can’t regulate property”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, and Sykes, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tilton v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSecond Circuit· 2016-06-01· cited 49×
- Metropolitan Omaha Property v. City of Omaha, NebraskaEighth Circuit· 2021-03-15· cited 11×
- Kenneth M. Crook v. City of Madison, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2015-07-02· cited 7×
- Crook v. City of MadisonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-09-30· cited 2×
- 211 Eighth, LLC v. Town of CarbondaleD. Colorado· 2013-02-11· cited 1×
- DPH Aurora Properties LLC v. City of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois· 2025-07-22· cited 1×
- Kenneth M. Crook v. City of Madison, MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2014-09-30
- Tilton v. SECSecond Circuit· 2016-06-01
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 2,940×
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1940-04-22· cited 2,351×
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court· 2008-03-18· cited 1,365×
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,235×
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 690×
- Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court· 1992-03-03· cited 616×
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 591×
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 585×
- Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman EstatesSeventh Circuit· 1988-04-20· cited 279×
- Napleton v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 254×
- Hodel v. IrvingSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 241×
- United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 231×
- United States v. StraubEleventh Circuit· 2007-11-29· cited 123×
- Mainstreet Organization of Realtors v. Calumet CitySeventh Circuit· 2007-10-17· cited 115×
- United States v. Spectro Foods Corporation, a CorporationThird Circuit· 1976-10-13· cited 101×
- A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Scott C. Newman, Prosecuting Attorney for Marion County Indiana, on Behalf of a Class of ProsecutorsSeventh Circuit· 2002-10-28· cited 94×
- Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-06-17· cited 82×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.