Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/8/2023

Mandala v. NTT Data, Inc.

Citations

  • 88 F.4th 353

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs “cannot be foreclosed from obtaining post-judgment relief solely because they chose to appeal rather than seek vacatur immediately upon dismissal”
  • holding that it is often “improper to simultaneously dismiss a complaint with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6) and deny leave to amend when the district court has not adequately informed the plaintiffs of its view of the complaint’s deficiencies”
  • “[I]n the absence of a valid rationale like undue delay or futility, it is improper to simultaneously dismiss a complaint with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6
  • “[A] 60(b)(1) motion to vacate must be filed within one year of entry of the judgment[.]”
  • “Rule 60(b)(1) and Rule 60(b)(6) are ‘mutually exclusive,’ such ‘that any conduct which generally falls under the former cannot stand as a ground for relief under the latter.’ . . . Thus, ‘[w]here a party’s Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.