Skip to main content

Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.

Citations

  • 898 So. 2d 69
  • 2005 WL 549933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “tipsy coachman rule” permits an appellate court to affirm a trial court order on the basis of an alternative theory which was not asserted in the court below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.