Hunter v. Allstate Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that automotive transportation expenses are covered under section 627.736(1)(a)
• interpreting reasonable and necessary expenses to include the transportation costs for medical treatment when using a private automobile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-03-10· cited 15×
• Derius v. Allstate Indem. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-10· cited 14×
• Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-21· cited 8×
• Padilla v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 7×
• Vasques v. Mercury Casualty Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-02· cited 7×
• Padilla v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-23· cited 6×
• DIRECT GENERAL INS. CO. v. Morris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-15· cited 4×
• Padilla v. LIBERTY MUT.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-17· cited 3×
• Stewart v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-14· cited 2×
• Garrido v. VICTORIA FIRE & CAS. CO.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-01· cited 2×
• Gaetan v. GEICO Indemnity Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-09-01· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mobley v. Jack & Son Plumbing
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-11-04· cited 18×
• Palma v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-28· cited 14×