Chapman v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the claimant has the burden to prove eligibility for benefits, including availability for work
• finding the de novo standard of review applied to review the appeals referee’s and Commission’s application of the law to the facts, but recognizing that the Commission’s interpretation of its statutes was entitled to great weight and would not be overturned unless it was clearly erroneous
• finding the de novo standard of review applied to review the appeals referee’s and Commission’s application of the law to the facts, but recognizing that the Commission’s interpretation of its statutes was entitled to great weight and would not be overturned unless it was clearly erroneous
• Commission’s interpretation of the statutes it administers is entitled to great weight and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).