Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 3/2/2001
Ex Parte Ferrell
Citations
- 819 So. 2d 83
- 2001 WL 220191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that prisoner satisfied definition of indigency in Rule 6.3(a) when he had a balance of $.17 in his prison account on the filing date, the maximum balance in the account in prior months was $40, and the filing fee was $140
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte MeltonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2002-06-07· cited 5×
- State v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama· 2002-02-22· cited 5×
- State v. SpenceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-05-25· cited 3×
- Cook v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama· 2016-03-04· cited 2×
- Ex parte William Keith Robey.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2014-08-29· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Smith v. BennettSupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 488×
- Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-12-19· cited 43×
- Ex Parte BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-09-01· cited 25×
- Hoppins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-12-28· cited 15×
- Ex Parte ColemanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-10-29· cited 10×
- Stafford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-08-19· cited 8×
- Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-11-01· cited 8×
- State v. OwensCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-03-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.