Skip to main content

State v. Downey

Citations

  • 476 N.E.2d 121
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The purpose of [§ 35-46-1-4(a)(1)] … is to authorize the intervention of the police power to prevent harmful consequences and injury to dependents.”
  • use of phrase “may endanger” in neglect of dependent statute “ha[d] a broadness and vagueness which would prevent it from meeting constitutional muster”
  • court may give narrowing construction where it is “consistent with legislative intent” and where language “does not indicate a critical legislative choice or represent the resolution of important issues within the social problem involved”
  • court may cure unconstitutional vagueness by giving statute “a narrowing construction to save it from nullification, where such construction does not establish a new or different policy basis and is consistent with legislative intent”
  • “The authority to define crime and establish penalties belongs to the legislature. A court cannot amend a statute . . . within its judicial authority to confine legislative products to constitutional limits.”
  • “The authority to define crimes and establish penalties belongs to the legislature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Giyan, Hunter, Prentice, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.