Skip to main content
· 9/12/2006

Walker v. Grow

Citations

  • 907 A.2d 255
  • 170 Md. App. 255
  • 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the burden is on a minority shareholder seeking to exclude the undistributed earnings to prove that the earnings are not available for child-support purposes
  • noting that in an above-guidelines case, circuit court may consider discretionary activities such as camp, music lessons, tutoring, and other programs to determine child support
  • noting that minority status is not dispositive on control issues stating “nature of the business, the governing documents, and the business and non-business relationship among the shareholders would also have to be considered”
  • “ ‘The trier of fact may believe or disbelieve, accredit or disregard, any evidence introduced.’ ”
  • “The weight to be given the expert’s testimony is a question for the fact finder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler, James, Kenney, Krauser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.