Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/18/1986

Major v. Major

Citations

518 A.2d 1267
359 Pa. Super. 344
1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 13118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the failure to disclose an asset, i.e., a military pension, did not amount to extrinsic fraud
concluding that the failure to disclose an asset, i.e., a military pension, did not amount to extrinsic fraud
opening of divorce decree was not proper remedy where requirements of 23 P.S. § 602 had not been satisfied
“in tent” of Act “was to grant relief to those parties who mistakenly treated military pensions as separate property due to the McCarty decision”
military pension benefits are marital property to extent they are acquired during marriage
“Although the record clearly demonstrates that appellant did not disclose to the lower court his military pension asset, we cannot say this failure to disclose amounted to extrinsic fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Olszewski, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.